<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pitch&#8217;s annual bicycle rant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kcbike.info/2006/07/29/pitchs-annual-bicycle-rant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kcbike.info/2006/07/29/pitchs-annual-bicycle-rant/</link>
	<description>Your city.  Your bike.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bks biker</title>
		<link>http://kcbike.info/2006/07/29/pitchs-annual-bicycle-rant/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>bks biker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kcbike.info/2006/07/29/pitchs-annual-bicycle-article/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>It's really hypocritical for the Pitch to gripe about bicycling in Kansas City when they completely ignore the issue for the other 364 days of the year.  Many of the other papers in the chain that owns the Pitch feature very regular coverage of bicycle culture and politics, so why is the Pitch so far behind the curve?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really hypocritical for the Pitch to gripe about bicycling in Kansas City when they completely ignore the issue for the other 364 days of the year.  Many of the other papers in the chain that owns the Pitch feature very regular coverage of bicycle culture and politics, so why is the Pitch so far behind the curve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twowheels</title>
		<link>http://kcbike.info/2006/07/29/pitchs-annual-bicycle-rant/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>twowheels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kcbike.info/2006/07/29/pitchs-annual-bicycle-article/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Kudos to the pitch for the column, but shame on them for so little coverage of our cycling world.  We really need more public awareness but the pitch really fails to cover this important issue for our city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to the pitch for the column, but shame on them for so little coverage of our cycling world.  We really need more public awareness but the pitch really fails to cover this important issue for our city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
